Quantcast
Channel: DIFC Courts
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1139

CFI 030/2015 Emirates Reit (CEIC) Limited v (1) Index Tower Residential Body Corporate (2) Associa Mena Owners Association Services

$
0
0

Claim No: CFI 030/2015

 

THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS

 

IN THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

BETWEEN

 

EMIRATES REIT (CEIC) LIMITED

   Claimant

 

and

 

(1) INDEX TOWER RESIDENTIAL BODY CORPORATE

First Defendant

(2) ASSOCIA MENA OWNERS ASSOCIATION SERVICES

                   Second Defendant


ORDER OF JUSTICE SIR DAVID STEEL


UPON hearing Counsel for the Claimant and Counsel for the Second Defendant at a hearing on 27 October 2015

AND UPON reviewing the Second Defendant’s submissions on costs dated 10 March 2016 and the Claimant’s submissions in response dated 31 March 2016

AND UPON reading the evidence recorded on the Court file

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

The Second Defendant shall pay the Claimant’s costs of their application for an injunction.

 

Issued by:

Maha Almehairi

Judicial Officer

Date of Issue: 12 April 2016

At: 4pm

SCHEDULE OF REASONS

1.The Second Defendants apply to submit further evidence on the issue of costs. I refuse that application. It is not appropriate to assess its merits, a portion by reference to the outcome of the Annual General Meeting (the “AGM”) as eventually held.

2. In my judgment, it is appropriate to make an order for costs against the Second Defendants by reason of their unreasonable conduct:

(a) They were informed of the Claimant’s objection to the AGM due on 27 October 2015 by letter dated 22 October 2015. An undertaking was sought fully which it was explained that an injunction would be sought together with costs.

(b) They were also informed by that letter that the DIFC Registrar of Real Property has convened a meeting for 25 October 2015. However, they refused to attend or otherwise participate in that meeting.

(c) That application was duly served on 25 October 2015. Only when the parties attended at Courts and notice was recieved of the Registrar’s decision to postpone the AGM was the undertaking furnished.

(d) The costs of the application could and should have been avoided by reason of reasonable and proportionate attitude on their part.

The post CFI 030/2015 Emirates Reit (CEIC) Limited v (1) Index Tower Residential Body Corporate (2) Associa Mena Owners Association Services appeared first on DIFC Courts.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1139

Trending Articles