Quantcast
Channel: DIFC Courts
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1139

Linee Commercial Bank (PJSC) v Levon 2020 [DIFC] SCT 088

$
0
0

SCT 088/2020

THE DUBAI INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL CENTRE COURTS

In the name of His Highness Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum, Ruler of Dubai

IN THE SMALL CLAIMS TRIBUNAL
BEFORE SCT JUDGE AND REGISTRAR NASSIR AL NASSER

BETWEEN

LINEE COMMERCIAL BANK (PJSC)

Claimant

and

LEVON

Defendant


Hearing : 30 April 2020
Judgment : 3 May 2020

JUDGMENT OF SCT JUDGE AND REGISTRAR NASSIR AL NASSER


UPON this Claim being filed on 3 March 2020

AND UPON a Consultation being held before SCT Judge Ayesha Bin Kalban on 15 April 2020 with the Claimant’s representative and the Defendant in attendance

AND UPON the parties failing to reach a settlement at the Consultation

AND UPON a hearing being held before SCT Judge Nassir Al Nasser on 30 April 2020 with the Claimant’s representative and the Defendant in attendance

AND UPON reviewing the documents and evidence submitted in the Court file

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Defendant shall pay the Claimant the amount of AED 131,733.06 in relation to sums owed for the Loan, plus interest at the rate of 9% per annum.

2. The Claimant’s Claim in relation to the Credit Card shall be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

3. The Defendant shall pay the Claimant the Court Fee in the sum of AED 6,586.65.


Issued by:
Nassir Al Nasser
SCT Judge and Registrar
Date of issue: 3 May 2020
At: 12pm

THE REASONS

Parties

1. The Claimant is Linee Commercial Bank, a bank providing financial services including credit cards and personal loans to customers (the “Claimant”).

2. The Defendant is Levon, an individual customer of the Claimant Bank (the “Defendant”).

Background

3. The parties entered into a written agreement on 21 April 2016, entitled ‘Linee Lend Personal Loan and Credit Card Application Form’ (the “Agreement”).

4. On 23 April 2016, following an Application made by the Defendant, the Claimant was approved for the sale of a Lend Personal Loan in the sum of AED 235,000, that was repayable in 48 monthly instalments of AED 5,759 (the “Personal Loan”).

5. The Personal Loan account has been in arrears since 6 October 2019. The outstanding amount allegedly owed by the Defendant to the Claimant in relation to the Personal Loan is in the sum of AED 131,733.06.

6. The Claimant also alleges that the Defendant was approved for the sale of a MasterCard Gold Credit Card (the “Credit Card”) with a limit of AED 54,000, which has been in arrears since 6 October 2019. The current outstanding amount allegedly owed by the Defendant to the Claimant in relation to the Credit Card is in the sum of AED 27,820.49.

7. Following the Defendant’s failure to keep up with his repayments, the Claimant filed a claim with the DIFC Courts’ Small Claims Tribunal (the “SCT”) to recover the amounts on 3 March 2020 (the “Claim”).

8. The Defendant failed to respond to the Claim. However, he attended the Consultation and the Hearing.

Discussion

9. This Claim includes two main elements. First, it must be established that the DIFC Courts have jurisdiction over both of the Claimant’s Claims, namely, the Loan Claim and the Credit Card Claim. Second, the two Claims must be assessed based on the documentary evidence provided to adjudicate whether the Defendant is in arrears and, if so, how much remains owing to the Claimant.

10. Due to the important fact that the SCT cannot give judgment on claims falling outside of its jurisdiction, I will address the SCT’s jurisdiction over each claim below.

The Loan Claim

11. The Claimant argues that the Agreement between the parties was signed by the Defendant on 21 April 2016 (a copy of the Agreement was attached to the case file). The Defendant received the total sum of AED 235,000 payable in 48 monthly instalments.

12. The Defendant paid 26 out of 48 instalments and the remaining outstanding balance is AED 131,733.06.

13. The Claimant contends that the DIFC Courts and the SCT have jurisdiction over the claim as the Defendant agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in the Top-Up Agreement, as presented on the Linee system, which states at Clause 18, as follows:

“the Civil Court of the Individual Emirates. The Federal Civil Courts of the United Arab Emirates, and the Courts of the Dubai International Financial Centre (including without limitation the Small Claims Tribunal of the DIFC). Shall have non-exclusive jurisdiction over all matters arising under the products’ terms and conditions save that bank shall have the right to file actions in any court with jurisdiction over you or your assets.”

14. I find that the parties have opted-in to the jurisdiction of the DIFC Courts pursuant to Clause 18 of the Terms and Conditions.

15. In relation to the Loan Claim, the Defendant failed to provide any defence to the claim, however, he argued that he is suffering with financial distress following the loss of his job and his failure to receive his end of service entitlements. Therefore, based on the documentary evidence before me, I am satisfied that the Defendant has been in arrears since 6 October 2019, and the remaining balance of the Loan is in the sum of AED 131,733.06.

16. The Claimant also requested for post judgment interest pursuant to the DIFC Courts’ Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017, which I shall award the Claimant.

The Credit Card Claim

17. In respect of the Credit Card Claim, the Claimant included the Credit Card Application form signed by the Defendant.

18. In relation to the jurisdiction, I note that neither of the parties is a DIFC entity nor have the parties validly opted-in to the SCT’s jurisdiction by way of written consent, thus, I am of the view that the SCT does not have jurisdiction over this Claim. While this is a valid argument for the Loan Claim, as per Clause 18 of the Terms and Conditions, this argument does not apply for the Credit Card Claim.

19. Therefore, I shall dismiss the Claimant’s claim for the sum of AED 27,820.49 in respect of the Credit Card.

20. The Defendant shall pay the Claimant the Court fee in the sum of AED 6,586.65.

Finding

21. The Defendant shall pay the Claimant the amount of AED 131,733.06 in relation to sums owed for the Loan, plus interest at the rate of 9% per annum.

22. The Claimant’s claim in relation to the Credit Card shall be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

23. The Defendant shall pay the Claimant the Court Fee in the sum of AED 6,586.65.


Issued by:
Nassir Al Nasser
SCT Judge and Registrar
Date of issue: 3 May 2020
At: 12pm


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1139

Trending Articles